Is the patenting of human genes wrong? (follow up to the ‘Sweet’ judicial decision on the Myriad patents)

A case against Gene Patents
J. Stiglitz and J. Sulston
April 16, 2010
The Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303348504575183982493601368.html

Excerpts:

“Genetic sequences are naturally occurring things, not inventions. No company should be allowed to monopolize research on them.”

“Patents such as those in this case not only prevent the use of knowledge in ways that would most benefit society, they may even impede scientific progress…”

Stiglitz suggests that a ‘portfolio’ of incentives/disincentives may be the best we can do. But once this portfolio includes patents, pharma can readily use this market power to distort the portfolio choice in its favor. According to Mark Thoma’s take on the Stiglitz and Sulston article, the portfolio approach requires “countervailing power”, power that appears to be sadly lacking. Thoma remains skeptical: “Unchecked, the portfolio approach would likely end up looking much like the system we already have, so it’s not clear to me that this is the answer.”

http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2010/04/the-case-against-gen…:+EconomistsView+(Economist’s+View+(EconomistsView))&utm_content=Google+International

What do you think?

Image: Close-up for the “Segmented” Invisible College – BRCA1 & BRCA2 Gene Researchers. Highlighted square nodes are the inventors on at least one BRCA1 or BRCA2 patent assigned to Myriad Genetics
http://www.lnxresearch.com/blog/2010/03/pow-right-on-the-kisser-myriad-geneti…

Brca_invisiblecollege_detail

Facilitating the Public Peer Review Process

Peer to Patent
“community patent review”
“…Peer-to-Patent opens the patent examination process to public participation for the first time.Become part of this historic program. Help the USPTO find the information relevant to assessing the claims of pending patent applications. Become a community reviewer and improve the quality of patents.”

http://www.peertopatent.org/

China’s agricultural patents are on the rise…

The China Centre for Intellectual Property in Agriculture reports that patent applications have doubled between 2002 and 2008. China’s applications (agricultural and other) under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) have also increased. Between 2008 and 2009, they increased by a third, representing almost 7,800 extra international applications.

“Agricultural innovations in areas such as GM crops have rapidly increased in number over the past decade, said CCIPA researcher Liu Lijun. GM crop applications stood at 342 last year, compared with 108 in 2002. And these innovations have been applied across the country. In 2008, around four million hectares of transgenic cotton were planted in the country, accounting for 70 per cent of China’s cotton land.”


http://www.scidev.net/en/news/china-s-agricultural-patents-on-the-rise.html?u…