As humans, we all experience a range of emotions: Anger, joy, sadness, surprise, fear and disgust. Fear and disgust are dominant emotional drivers. And you can thank your ancestors for that. Research suggests that we have evolved an “ingrained cognitive response” to things that we perceive as threatening (like spiders and snakes) so that we may survive as a human species.
A personal anecdote
I was involved in a serious car accident in 1986. It was what is referred to as a ‘miss and run’. There were devastating losses (I won’t get into the tragic details). It’s been almost thirty years [update: 32 years ago as of 2018] and while some things were quickly lost in the haze of shock or eventually blurred by time, certain images still lucidly dance across my mind.
Like The Closer You Get…it’s the title track from Alabama’s 7th studio album of the same name. It was playing on cassette in the truck stereo. In the immediate aftermath of the crash, those beloved classic harmonies were like nails on a chalkboard to me. “Can you please turn the music off?” I asked. An attending RCMP officer obliged, reaching past me through the passenger window to switch off the stereo.
The fear that we felt before and after impact was palpable. Actually, fear became a regular, unwelcome guest in my life. It took several months (dare I say, years) before I could travel down that stretch of highway without experiencing anxiety. Similarly, it was a long time before I could listen to that Alabama song without my stomach turning inside out. For me, Highway #7 and that ill-fated song had become synonymous with pain, loss and suffering.
The twin responses of fear and disgust are often intertwined
Feardrivers fall along a continuum. There are immediate and tangible fears; ones that come with real risks. For example, you are caught in a natural disaster like an earthquake or in a flood, or you are at risk of drowning because you overturned your canoe and you don’t have a lifejacket on, or you are skidding on black ice into oncoming traffic on a very busy highway. There are other fears, though, that we experience; those are often perceived as less-than-rational. Things like the fear of needles, of spiders and snakes (see above), of heights or even the fears of leaving your own home. Some fears can be socially debilitating.
Disgustis slightly different but still related. It is the very human response to something we may view as unpleasant or vile in our environment. The ‘contamination-avoidance’ mechanism that kicks in to help us make decisions about something. I had a good friend that loved the name Paris but, in disgust, refused to name her baby daughter that because of what she viewed as Paris Hilton’s highly public, immoral foibles. She couldn’t separate the name Paris from the actions of the celebrity persona. That’s anecdotal, but the human response phenomenon has been studied by scholars too. For example, psychologist Paul Rozin conducted a study that included 50 respondents where he discovered, among other things, that people will outwardly and immediately reject delicious, tasty brownies if they are presented in the shape of something unpalatable, like dog feces (imagine that).
Fear and disgust are not only experientially-based, they can be triggered and spread via the power of the Internet and social media. For example, James McWilliams outlines how the rhetoric of disgust can undermine our food choices. In a recent interview by Roberto Ferdman in the Washington Post, Alan Levinovitz, James Madison University Prof and author of The Gluten Lie, is quoted as saying: “…[S]preading fear, before we actually know the truth, endangers society…” We have to take care to tread carefully through those provocative headlines, stories and blogs.
Our emotional responses shape our opinions and beliefs. Our opinions and beliefs are reinforced through our personal networks and once stuff gets stuck in our psyche, it’s pretty hard to displace it. Paul Rozin et al (1986) refer to the laws of contagion and similarity, where 1) contagion is qualified as “once in contact, always in contact”), and; 2) similarity holds that “the image equals the object”. There’s an enduring ‘stickiness’ to images and ideas that are synonymous with our emotional responses. That’s why the word Frankenfood (and the associated images) has been so pervasive in how we view GM foods. And why people object more to GM food than to GMOs developed for other applications (such as insulin in the treatment of diabetes) (Blancke et al 2015).
The closer you get…
There are physical and moral dimensions of disgust. On that fateful day in 1986 (and many days after), I experienced both. That Alabama song elicited a strong physical response in me – a stomach-churning, heart-palpating reaction. It was a benign, harmless song but one that I associated with a negative experience in my life.
My contempt for the ‘phantom driver’ (Mr. ‘miss and hit’ Guy), on the other hand, existed more on the moral plane. (Please note, my ill-will towards this faceless and nameless individual eventually faded over the years — forgiveness and passage of time are beautiful things, no?)
My fears, at the time, were very present, very real (to me) and also very debilitating. It took a great deal of healing and time before those emotional responses no longer overwhelmed or defined me. Fear and disgust are provoked when we perceive a threat from something. Each emotion can lead us down a different response path. While fear primes us to run (‘flight’), disgust readies us to evade something that repulses us. Distinguishing real risk from manufactured or perceived risk requires critical thought. We need to give some time and thought to rationally consider what the real risks of a given situation are. In the end, it’s all about quality of life.
“If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.”
– Marcus Aurelius –
Blancke, Steffan, Frank Van Breusegem, Geert De Jaeger, Johan Braeckman, and Marc Van Montagu (2015/in press). “Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.” Trends in Plant Science.
Levinovitz, Alan. (2015 forthcoming). The Gluten Lie.
New, Joshua J. and Tamsin C. German. (2015). “Spiders at the cocktail party: an ancestral threat that surmounts inattentional blindness.” Evolution and Human Behavior. Volume 36, Issue 3. Pps: 165-173.
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2008). “Disgust: The body and soul emotion in the 21st century.” In D. McKay & O. Olatunji (eds.), Disgust and its disorders. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Pps: 9-29.
Rozin, Paul, Linda Millman, and Carol Nemeroff. (1986). “Operation of the Laws of Sympathetic Magic in Disgust and Other Domains.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Volume 50, No. 4. Pps: 703-712.
5 thoughts on “The Closer You Get… the fear and disgust response”
Cami, I’m sorry for the trauma and loss you experienced.
Emotions shape our responses to stimuli, and, as we’re learning from current research, our decisions and opinions as well. We are not purely rational. While that seems obvious in some ways, we continue to counter fear-mongering campaigns about food and vaccines with information. The value of vaccines may be apparent when disease outbreaks occur, but food is more complicated. It’s too easy to scare people, and too difficult to prove the absence of harm when a multitude of spurious correlations can be cited. Once fear sets in, corporations bend over backwards to give people food choices that feel safe, so we lose access to safe foods and opportunities for verifying their safety.
I’ve given up cooking for friends. I can’t design a menu that addresses all the various aversions people have. I’ve even had friends refuse to drink filtered water because it was poured from a plastic container; it elicited a visceral reaction.
In the aftermath of our local campaign for “front of package” labeling of GMOs (it lost), I’ve quit buying any organic products. The lies of the organic lobby were just over the top. Friends I thought to be intelligent are certain I’ve been duped into believing that there’s no GMO wheat in our food.
Truth be told, I think large scale industrial agriculture has had negative impacts on our environment, but I also believe that farmers large and small are learning more sustainable practices. I don’t see how GMOs are incompatible with sustainable agricultural practices. I do see the downside of fear-mongering.
Thanks for the comment. It’s a complex world; a melting pot of misplaced perceptions that only serve to distract us from addressing some of the real problems out there. The issue is that most folks aren’t interested in solving problems anyway. Which then suggests that much of how critics think, perceive, and behave does nothing but cause them a lot of unnecessary stress. Implications of first-world living.
There must have been a whopper of a trigger but I feel your pain. Hopefully, as we (the consumers of the world) age, we will mature enough to learn and be less quick to judge. I have at least partaken in the aging. I do love a good puzzle though.
Take care my friend
Pingback: Fast ‘Information’ Nation? The social costs of our highly connected world | Cami Ryan
Reblogged this on Camistry and commented:
32 years ago today, Blair and I were in a serious car accident. It was soon after we were (first) married and I was pregnant with our first son. You don’t know our son Abraham because Abraham didn’t survive.
As I often do, I like to write my way through things. It helps me to understand myself and the world that I live in. I’ve always journaled. And some of my journal entries I’ve turned into public blog posts (edited, of course).
So, here’s one about that tragic time in our lives. Warning: a lot of it is “sciencey”. It is about the human cognitive and behavioral response to tragedy and how that can shape the way we view risk (fear); the way we perceive others and the world (with fear). It’s also about mind-numbing and soul-sucking depression – if you care to read between the lines.
Excerpt: “There are physical and moral dimensions of disgust. On that fateful day in 1986 (and many days after), I experienced both. That Alabama song elicited a strong physical response in me – a stomach-churning, heart-palpating reaction. It was a benign, harmless song but one that I associated with a negative experience in my life.”
You must log in to post a comment.