Bill C-474

Bill C-474 was introduced by Alex Atamanenko, the NDP Agriculture Critic and MP for British Columbia Southern Interior. Bill C-474 is said to support Canadian farmers by requiring that “an analysis of potential harm to export markets be conducted before the sale of any new genetically engineered seed is permitted.”

Alex Atamanenko’s Letter to the Editor of the Western Producer regarding Bill C-474:

Wed 27 Jan 2010

Dear Editor,

I read with interest the January 21 article in the Western Producer about my Private Members Bill C-474, ‘NDP MP’s Bill Worries Canola Industry’. The article gives voice to the industry preference to avoid the market analysis of new GM crops being proposed by this Bill and presents a rather hollow argument that this could put a chill on R&D. It struck me that there was absolutely no acknowledgement of the market reality which exists internationally towards GM. The recent loss of our flax markets due to contamination by GM Triffid makes it pretty clear that a GM technology that is not accepted by our major export markets has no economic value whatsoever.

European zero-tolerance is the current reality. The outcome of any possible negotiations toward low-tolerance levels in other countries is far from guaranteed and relying on this potential future change in policy leaves farmers with no protection. Is it not more prudent to learn from the current crisis of GM flax contamination and take concrete measures to protect our export markets?

The industry warns against introducing “politics” into GM approvals in Canada but my Bill is about economics, not politics. What are the economic realities for farmers if GM alfalfa or GM wheat are introduced, for example? Is the possibility of market closure an acceptable risk? Do we introduce new GM crops at any cost, even if this cost is our own markets? The reality is that GM contamination happens and is hurting farmers in Canada.
Flax farmers knew that the threat of GM contamination was a danger to their European markets. Unfortunately, they were right. There is nothing in our current regulations to prevent the commercialization of GM seeds that we know would lead to economic disaster.

The biotech industry may wish to avoid this economic reality but the people’s government should not have that luxury. Bill C-474 is meant to ensure that the government provides an analysis of the level of market acceptance before permitting the introduction of new GM seeds. I believe this is a necessary step to ensure that farmers are protected from unwanted GM contamination that could actually destroy their business.

Alex Atamanenko, MP
BC Southern Interior
NDP Agriculture Critic

http://alexatamanenko.ndp.ca/node/473

2 thoughts on “Bill C-474

  1. By Rod NickelApril 28, 2010www.reuters.comSays would hurt Canada’s trading reputationBill requires market-impact study of GMO seedsConservative government opposes bill, but lacks majorityWINNIPEG, Manitoba, April 28 (Reuters) – The head of Syngenta’s <synn> Canadian division warned on Wednesday of “enormous consequences” to Canada’s trading reputation if Ottawa passes a bill curbing genetically modified crops.The legislation, currently before the House of Commons, would require Ottawa to analyze the possible harm to export markets prior to approving any new genetically modified (GMO) seeds.”The resulting consequences of passing Bill C-474 could be enormous to the Canadian agricultural industry and to Canada’s reputation as a science-based trading nation,” Jay Bradshaw, president of Syngenta Canada, said in a speech he was scheduled to deliver in Ottawa to a business audience.http://www.truthabouttrade.org/news/latest-news/15938-syngenta-canada-warns-o

Leave a Reply